<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Agent-Governance on The Farah Stack</title><link>https://thefarahstack.com/tags/agent-governance/</link><description>Recent content in Agent-Governance on The Farah Stack</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://thefarahstack.com/tags/agent-governance/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Technical Analysis: IRREGULAR, Containment Failure, and What It Means for Agent Governance</title><link>https://thefarahstack.com/posts/irregular-containment-failure/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thefarahstack.com/posts/irregular-containment-failure/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://thefarahstack.com/images/posts/irregular-containment-failure.png" alt="Containment failure"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;If your eval can reach the open internet, it is not an eval. It is unsupervised deployment with better branding.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;IRREGULAR sits in a weird place in the stack. Frontier labs hire it to run pre-deployment cyber evaluations: CTF-style scenarios, simulated corporate networks, multi-stage attack paths. The point is to measure whether a model can plan and execute real offensive campaigns before release. That work only works if the environment looks realistic. It also only works if &amp;ldquo;realistic&amp;rdquo; never becomes &amp;ldquo;actual production internet.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>